Legal Opinion

Dominici v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1964No. 10648PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from two judgments on verdicts obtained in district court by reason of appellant’s alleged liability under its policy of automobile insurance. The two actions involved were consolidated for trial and will be treated together on this appeal.

Appellant will hereinafter be referred to by a portion of its corporate name, State Farm. Respondents, Gus and Angelina Dominici will hereinafter be referred to collectively as plaintiffs.

Gus Dominici, one of the plaintiffs, purchased a policy of insurance from State Farm. Although the policy was one for public liability and property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Levy v. American Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. Kirouac v. HealeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  5. Green v. WolffMontana Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API