Legal Opinion

Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 1996No. C4-95-376PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

This appeal raises the question whether, in a subrogation action by an underinsured motorist insurance carrier, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the accident or on the date the carrier substitutes its check for a check offered in settlement by the tortfeasor’s insurance carrier. In this case, the action by the underinsured motorist insurance carrier was commenced more than six years from the date of the accident, but within six years of the date the check was substituted. The district court, in granting summary judgment, concluded that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Maine Municipal Employees Health Trust v. MaloneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API