Legal Opinion

Hupp v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1989No. Nos. 05-86-00531-CR, 05-86-00532-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

LAGARDE, Justice.

On this remand, the sole issue to be determined is whether the trial court’s submission of the unconstitutional good time and parole instruction to the jury contributed to the punishment the jury assessed the appellant Robert Arthur Hupp. We hold that the submission of the instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Hupp was originally convicted in two cases of aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen. The cases were tried together before the same jury, who assessed punishment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Hupp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Hupp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. Hupp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API