Hupp v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, Justice.
Robert Arthur Hupp appeals his convictions for aggravated sexual assault of two children. The jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment in each case. In three points of error, appellant contends that 1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at his trial, 2) the jury instructions regarding the parole law and good conduct time violated the separation of powers doctrine, and 3) the jury instructions regarding the parole law and good conduct time constituted a denial of due process. We overrule all points of error and affirm the convictions.
Appellant’s first point of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fetterolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Wylie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Hupp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.