Legal Opinion

Hupp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1988No. 0602-87PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the offense of Aggravated Sexual Assault on two children. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at confinement for Life in the Texas Department of Corrections.

On direct appeal, Appellant argued the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the law concerning good time and parole, inasmuch as the charge is predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. The Court of Appeals rejected appellant’s challenge to Article 37.07, Sec. 4, V.A.C.C.P. Hupp v. State, 729 S.W.2d 355…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Hupp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fetterolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  3. Wylie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  4. Hupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Hupp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API