Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 7, 1989No. 05-85-01244-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Justice.

On this remand, the sole remaining issue to be determined is whether the trial court’s submission of the unconstitutional good time and parole instructions to the jury contributed to the punishment the jury assessed the appellant. We hold that the submission of the instructions was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant was originally convicted of murder and assessed a life sentence. On *586his appeal to this Court, he contended that the trial court erred in submitting good time and parole instructions to the jury on the grounds that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Hupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Payne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API