Legal Opinion

Hupp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1991No. Nos. 1097-89, 1098-89PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of two aggravated sexual assault offenses and assessed his punishment at life in the Texas Department of Corrections.1 These convictions were affirmed, Hupp v. State, 729 S.W.2d 355 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1987), but this Court granted appellant’s petitions for discretionary review and remanded in light of Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr.App.1987). Hupp v. State, 761 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.Cr.App. 1988), and Hupp v. State, 761 S.W.2d 11 (Tex.Cr.App.1988). On remand the Court of Appeals again affirmed.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Hupp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Hupp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Hupp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynoso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API