Legal Opinion
State v. Burgess
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 2, 2010No. 09-103 & 09-104PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. This appeal and cross-appeal stem from consolidated civil suspension and criminal proceedings against defendant for driving under the influence (DUI). Defendant appeals the trial court’s final ruling against him in the civil suspension case, and the State appeals the court’s interlocutory ruling suppressing the Datamaster breathalyzer test results in the criminal case. Defendant argues that the civil suspension hearing should have been dismissed because: (1) the exit order was not justified by a reasonable suspicion of DUI; and (2) the trial court improperly applied a statutory…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- State v. NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. GieseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.