Legal Opinion
State v. Giese
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided August 27, 2014No. 2013AP2009-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
¶ 1. We granted Todd Giese's petition for leave to appeal a nonfinal order that denied his motion to exclude expert testimony concerning retrograde extrapolation of Giese's blood alcohol concentration. There are two objectives in writing this opinion. First, to explain what the Dauber1 rule is and what it is not. Second, to decide whether the retrograde extrapolation opinion in this case satisfies Daubert.
¶ 2. Giese argues that the expert opinion is inadmissible under Wis. Stat. § 907.02 (2011-12),2 as amended in 2011 to codify the standard from Daubert and its progeny. Giese claims that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bigon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Seifert ex rel. Scoptur v. BalinkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- State v. ChitwoodCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Unity Bayer ex rel. Petrucelli v. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.