In Re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Property owner JAM Golf, LLC (applicant) appeals the Environmental Court’s denial of a permit for a proposed ten-lot subdivision in South Burlington. Applicant raises four issues on appeal, claiming the court erred by: (1) admitting expert testimony concerning wildlife corridors; (2) concluding that the project did not protect wildlife habitat or scenic views; (3) finding that the project did not conform to the city plan; and (4) denying the project a permit, rather than remanding the case to the development review board. We reverse the court’s conclusion and remand for further findings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- In Re John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re LaBerge NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Chaves A250 Permit ReconsiderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Toor and Toor Living Trust NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.