Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 22, 2008No. 06-307PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Property owner JAM Golf, LLC (applicant) appeals the Environmental Court’s denial of a permit for a proposed ten-lot subdivision in South Burlington. Applicant raises four issues on appeal, claiming the court erred by: (1) admitting expert testimony concerning wildlife corridors; (2) concluding that the project did not protect wildlife habitat or scenic views; (3) finding that the project did not conform to the city plan; and (4) denying the project a permit, rather than remanding the case to the development review board. We reverse the court’s conclusion and remand for further findings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. In Re John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. In re LaBerge NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. In re Chaves A250 Permit ReconsiderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In re Toor and Toor Living Trust NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API