Legal Opinion

State v. Neisner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 29, 2010No. 2009-395PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Following a hit-and-run accident, a jury found defendant guilty of grossly negligent operation of a motor vehicle, leaving the scene of an accident, giving false information to a law enforcement authority, and impeding a public officer. He appeals on several grounds, claiming the trial court erred in: (1) allowing the prosecution to charge him twice for the same offense when both the charge of giving false information to a police officer and the charge of impeding an officer require the same elements of proof; (2) imposing a thirty-nine-day sentence for the false information charge in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Stephanie BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. State v. Tristan CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  3. In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API