Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 28, 2014No. 1 CA-SA 13-0132PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Judge.

¶ 1 The State seeks special action relief from the trial court’s order granting Defendant’s motion in limine. The trial court’s order precluded the State’s expert from testifying that, based on his retrograde extrapolation calculation, Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) was above the legal limit within two hours of driving. Because we conclude the expert’s testimony is admissible under Arizona Rule of Evidence 702, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 In May 2009, Suzanne Raequel Madrid (“Defendant”) was stopped by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GieseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  2. Marsalis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter FoshayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. BaucumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API