Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
HOOK, Circuit Judge.
The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company was indicted, convicted, and fined for violations of the amendment to the interstate commerce law, commonly known as the “Elkins Act” (Act Feb. 19, 1903, c. 708, 33 Stat. 847 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 880]), in giving to certain packing companies concessions from established rates of transportation between Kansas City, Kan., and New York City and Hoboken, N. J., on packing-house products destined for export. In Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 82 C. C. A. 135, 153 Fed. 1, we affirmed judgments against the packing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1906
- United States v. Camden Iron WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- United States v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1911
- Wichita Falls W. Ry. of Texas v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.