Legal Opinion

United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo America

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1960No. 16409_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

Mississippi Valley Barge Line, a common carrier by water in interstate commerce, instituted this action in July 1957, asserting jurisdiction under the Tucker Act and, specifically, under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 and 1337, against the United States for unpaid portions of charges for shipments of government freight in 1956 and 1957. The United States by its amended answer conceded liability for these charges but, by permissive counterclaims filed under Rule 13(b), F.R.Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., alleged offsetting liability on the part of the Barge Line for damages to other…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Rock Island Millwork Co. v. Hedges-Gough Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Mary GREENE, Appellant, v. CARTER CARBURETOR CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. James L. MooringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Hopper Furs, Inc. v. Emery Air Freight CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API