Legal Opinion

United States v. Wood

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Criminal Prosecution for Acceptance of Rebates in Violation of the Interstate Commerce Act.

1Opinion of the CourtHolland, District Judge

(charging jury). The defendants Walter Wood and Stuart Wood, are charged in this indictment with having received a rebate and concession from a common carrier, engaged in interstate commerce; whereby 1,500 tons of iron pipe were transported from Florence and Camden, in the state of New Jerséy, and from Emaus, in the state of Pennsylvania, to Winnipeg, in the province of Manitoba, Dominion of Canada, at a less rate than that named in the lawful tariffs published and filed by the common carriers over which the property was transported; that is to say, they are charged with having received a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Coeur d'Alene & Spokane Railway Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ingalls v. Maine Cent. R.District Court, D. Maine · 1928
  4. United States v. Munson Steamship LineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API