United States v. Camden Iron Works
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
On Motion in Arrest of Judgment and for a New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLIvAND, District Judge.
This is a motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial on an information charging the defendant with having received a rebate in violation of the provisions of the act of Congress approved February 4, 1887 (24 Stat. 379, c. 104 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154]), entitled “An act to regulate commerce,” and the acts amendatory thereto.
First. Ijhe case was properly prosecuted by information. Rev. St. § 1022 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 720], provides:
“All crimes and offenses committed against the provisions of chapter seven, title ‘Crimes,’ which are not Infamous, may be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ansbro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Falconi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
- Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.