Legal Opinion

United States v. Camden Iron Works

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1907No. 31PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Motion in Arrest of Judgment and for a New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLIvAND, District Judge.

This is a motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial on an information charging the defendant with having received a rebate in violation of the provisions of the act of Congress approved February 4, 1887 (24 Stat. 379, c. 104 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3154]), entitled “An act to regulate commerce,” and the acts amendatory thereto.

First. Ijhe case was properly prosecuted by information. Rev. St. § 1022 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 720], provides:

“All crimes and offenses committed against the provisions of chapter seven, title ‘Crimes,’ which are not Infamous, may be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ansbro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Falconi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  2. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  5. United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API