Legal Opinion

United States v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 3, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On Demurrer to Indictment for Granting Rebates in Violation of the Provision of the Elkins Act.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

The substantial offense charged in the indictment is that pursuant to agreement made in 1898, between a duly accredited agent of the defendant and a similarly accredited agent of the Brooklyn Cooperage Company, certain goods were transported *294in 1903 from Poplar Bluffs, Iowa, to New York City at less than the tariff rates; such result being accomplished by an agreement for rebates from the legal tariff, which rebates were paid by the defendant in 1903 and 1904. The goods in question were transported over the lines of several railroads, of which the Missouri-Pacific…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. United States v. Camden Iron WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ZiebarthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  2. United States v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API