Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Lantz

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff entered on the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The plaintiff is a son of Bertha Carlson Witt, sometimes called Bertha Carlson or Bertha Schubert Witt, and sues in his representative capacity as special administrator of her estate. Bertha Carlson Witt died about February 5, 1923. Thereafter and about the twenty-first day of February, 1923, a will dated January 5, 1921, by which the decedent devised and bequeathed all of her property to the defendant, Charles Lantz, was filed by Lantz for probate. A proceeding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Pomeroy v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Munfrey v. ClearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Moore v. HoarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API