In re Coffey
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in the Supreme Court in Bank for the disbarment of an attorney. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Section 518 of the Penal Code reads: “Extortion is the obtaining of property from another with his consent induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color *523of official right.” Section 524 provides: “Every person who unsuccessfully attempts, hy means of any verbal threat, such as is specified in section 519, to extort money or other property from another, is guilty of a misdemeanor.” Section 287 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares: “An attorney and counselor may be removed or suspended by the supreme court or any department thereof, or by any superior court of the state, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- People v. ParrishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.