Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hoff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1913No. 2275PublishedCited by 12 opinions

JJlrror from District Court, Olcmulgee County; TF. L. Barnum, Judge. Action by John E. Harrison, Administrator, against J. G. Hoff and others, in which John W. Foster and others intervene. From the judgment, Foster and others bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

John Brown, a Creek freedman, was allotted as surplus the N. % of the N. W. % and the S. W. % of the N. W. % of section 13, township 13 north,1 range 13 east. The S. E. % of the N. W. % of said section was allotted to him as homestead. Beginning in the year 1904, the allottee made various deeds of conveyance to all or parts of his allotment to various persons; viz., Bradley. Realty Bank & Trust Company, Scott Yeatman, Continental Land Company, IT. L. Braves, who later conveyed to Elmer E. Lowe, H. A. Leekley, and P. E. Heckman. These conveyances all appear to have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas v. HardenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bonicamp v. StarbuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Haynes Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Jones Leather Co. v. WoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Inman v. Western Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API