Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1926No. 16129PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cpinion by

RUTH, C.

E. W. Whitney will be designated as plaintiff and James H. Cobb as defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The.record discloses that T. S. Cobb and James H. Cobh are brothers and were engaged in the practice of law as partners. The funds of the partnership were deposited in the name of the older brother, T. S. Cobb, but were subject to cheek of either partner. T. g. Cobb was stricken with paralysis and he conveyed certain farm lands to his brother, James I-I. Cobb, to enable defendant to transfer the same and to take care of the interests of T. S. Cobb generally.

It is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Parks v. Sinai Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ball v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Cook v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Lyons v. LyonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Mailath v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API