Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'r v. Soliss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1915No. 5607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District .Court, Creek County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Assigned Judge. Action by the State, on the relation of J. ÍD. Lankford, State Bank Commissioner of Oklahoma, against Mary Soliss, executrix of the estate of John P. Soliss, deceased, and another.. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBBERTS, C.

The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below, and for the sake of brevity we will call the plaintiff in error plaintiff, and defendants in error defendants.

This is an action for recovery of money on a promissory note. On November 22, 1911, Ed. C. Reynolds, John P. Soliss, and H. H. MeFann made, executed, and delivered their certain promissory note in the sum of $5,554.14 to the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank of Sapulpa, Okla. John P. Soliss departed this life on the 5th day of April, 1912, and Mary Soliss was thereafter duly appointed and qualified as his executrix. On the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Marshall v. John Deere Plow Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Inman v. Western Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Roche Valley Land Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re Baeza's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Marshall v. State Ex Rel. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Vance v. LevensonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API