Legal Opinion

Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 25, 2011No. 09-289 LPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in this “rails-to-trails” case. Plaintiffs allege a Fifth Amendment taking of their properties which were subject to a railroad right-of-way along two segments of a corridor running from Lowell, Michigan, to Greenville, Michigan, in Kent, Ionia, and Montcalm counties.

Pursuant to a Petition for Exemption submitted by Mid-Michigan Railroad, Inc. (“Mid-Michigan,” “MMRR,” or “the railroad”) to abandon its rail line between Lowell, at milepost 103.20, and Greenville, at milepost 78.50, the Surface…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. FOX v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Ybanez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Carolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API