Legal Opinion

The Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 21, 2013No. 09-289LPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rails-to-Trails; Crossing Rights; National Trails System Act; Trail Use Agreements; Whether State Law Property Rights Pre-empted

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge:

The parties have filed opposing motions for summary judgment in this “rails-to-trails” case on the question whether certain plaintiffs retain or otherwise possess rights to cross the recreational trail corridor that bisects their properties. What had been a right-of-way for railroad purposes was converted by operation of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq. (2006) (“the Trails Act”) to a recreational trail (and reserved via…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Baley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API