The Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-Trails; Crossing Rights; National Trails System Act; Trail Use Agreements; Whether State Law Property Rights Pre-empted
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge:
The parties have filed opposing motions for summary judgment in this “rails-to-trails” case on the question whether certain plaintiffs retain or otherwise possess rights to cross the recreational trail corridor that bisects their properties. What had been a right-of-way for railroad purposes was converted by operation of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq. (2006) (“the Trails Act”) to a recreational trail (and reserved via…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sears v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Baley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.