Legal Opinion
Ybanez v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 5, 2011No. 09-172LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiffs own property along a 4.57-mile railroad corridor in Ellis County, Texas. Union Pacific Railroad used the corridor for rail traffic until 2003. On November 17, 2005, the Railroad filed a Notice of Exemption with the Surface Transportation Board, pursuant to the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, 16 U.S.C. § 1274(d). In accordance with that Act, the City of Waxahachie, Texas, filed a request for issuance of a Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU) in February 2006. The Surface Transportation Board issued the NITU as requested. Thereafter, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Carolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.