Legal Opinion

National Secretarial Service, Inc. v. Froehlich

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1989No. B035465PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

The defendants are attorney Kent Froehlich (Froehlich) and Kent Froehlich, a professional corporation, (Corporation; hereinafter collectively defendants). They appeal from a judgment entered in an action originally filed by plaintiff National Secretarial Service, Inc. (National). National filed suit in municipal court and sought to recover approximately $6,448 as the unpaid amount due for secretarial services rendered over a five-year period. While not disputing that valuable services were performed, defendants responded with a number of technical and procedural defenses…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Salas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. County of Sacramento v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Wysinger v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO. CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API