In Re Estate of Fain
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this probate matter we consider an appeal by a former administrator of the decedent’s estate and her surety from a judgment imposing a surcharge of $715,000, plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs. Eleanor Fain and her surety, Highlands Insurance Company (Highlands; collectively, the appellants), seek reversal of a “Judgment After Trial” entered after a 12-day bench trial conducted by an agreed-upon retired judge. The primary issues raised are whether the trial judge was properly appointed and empowered to render a binding judgment and, if so, whether substantial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Richard S.California Supreme Court · 1991
- National Secretarial Service, Inc. v. FroehlichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Foust v. San Jose Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Leader v. CordsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kern County Department of Child Support Services v. CamachoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Seneca InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.