County of Sacramento v. Lackner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
This appeal presents a controversy over Medi-Cal payments which plaintiff counties allege are due them from the defendants. Defendants appeal from a judgment granting the County of Sacramento, County of Alameda, and intervener County of San Mateo (unless otherwise specified, referred to as plaintiffs) declaratory relief and a peremptory writ of mandate. The judgment found that certain Medi-Cal payments made were insufficient in amount and directed reimbursement to the counties and declaratory relief.
In 1965, California adopted the Medi-Cal program (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 14000…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Rios v. CozensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ben C.California Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.