Legal Opinion

County of Sacramento v. Lackner

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1979No. Civ. 17051PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

This appeal presents a controversy over Medi-Cal payments which plaintiff counties allege are due them from the defendants. Defendants appeal from a judgment granting the County of Sacramento, County of Alameda, and intervener County of San Mateo (unless otherwise specified, referred to as plaintiffs) declaratory relief and a peremptory writ of mandate. The judgment found that certain Medi-Cal payments made were insufficient in amount and directed reimbursement to the counties and declaratory relief.

In 1965, California adopted the Medi-Cal program (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 14000…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Rios v. CozensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ben C.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API