Legal Opinion

Reichardt v. Reichardt

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1960No. Civ. 24937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Plaintiff-wife appeals from order dismissing her motion for modification of interlocutory decree of divorce with respect to alimony provisions. The ruling plainly was based upon want of jurisdiction.

The decree granted a divorce to each party and provided: “The defendant and cross-complainant is further hereby Ordered and directed to pay to plaintiff the sum of $150.00 per month by way of alimony, payable in instalments of $150.00 on the first day of each and every month for a period of three full years from and after the date of the entry of this Interlocutory Judgment. ’ ’ It was signed and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tolle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dahlstet v. DahlstetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Ziganto v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Mercer v. MercerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API