Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Baldwin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 19, 1934No. 19PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
This petition for a writ of mandamus, filed in this-Court by leave, prays that the federal court for southern Texas and Thomas M. Kennerly, judge thereof, be commanded to take jurisdiction, on a petition for removal, of a suit instituted in a state court of Texas by Tyrrell-Garth Investment Company. The petitioners are the defendants in that suit. Two of them, Baldwin and Thompson, are ■the trustees in bankruptcy of the Missouri Pacific Railroad system and are operating it. They were appointed by orders of the federal court for eastern Missouri entered in proceedings for reorganization under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gardner v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.