Moore v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Brian Moore (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) grant of Babcock & Wilcox Company’s (Employer) suspension petition and reversed the WCJ’s grant of Claimant’s penalty petition. The WCJ and the Board found that Claimant, while under house arrest, was “incarcerated” and ineligible for benefits under of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We affirm.
In July 1994, Claimant began receiving workers’ compensation benefits. Since that time, Claimant was convicted of crimes in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Brinker's International, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Weissenstein)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Moore v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Rogele, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.