Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rogele, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 2009No. 1206 C.D. 2008Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

I respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority that Section 306(a.l) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 77 P.S. § 511.1,1 clearly and unambiguously requires payment of compensation to an incarcerated claimant up until the pronouncement of criminal sentence. For this reason and others discussed below, I would reverse and remand.

Relevantly, after his layoff in June, 2004, Todd Mattson (Claimant) received total disability benefits for injuries to his right wrist. In October 2005, he was incarcerated without bail on charges that he…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. MinnichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. PalarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API