Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
The issues presented in this appeal involve (1) the eligibility of a person involuntarily committed as a condition of probation for workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to section 306(a)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 77 P.S. § 511(2) 1 ,and (2) the entitlement of an employer to a credit for overpayment of benefits. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm, although on different grounds than those relied upon by the Commonwealth Court. 2
On December 20, 1980, Daniel Hendrie (“Claimant”) injured his back during the course of employment. His employer,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ConahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Brutico v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Mino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.