Legal Opinion

Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2001No. A97-3598PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The issues presented in this appeal involve (1) the eligibility of a person involuntarily committed as a condition of probation for workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to section 306(a)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 77 P.S. § 511(2) 1 ,and (2) the entitlement of an employer to a credit for overpayment of benefits. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm, although on different grounds than those relied upon by the Commonwealth Court. 2

On December 20, 1980, Daniel Hendrie (“Claimant”) injured his back during the course of employment. His employer,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. ConahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Chamberlain v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Brutico v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Mino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API