Legal Opinion

Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1991No. 768 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Joseph S. Yinglinsky (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision which dismissed Penn Installation’s (Employer) petition for termination. The issue presented for our review is whether Employer is entitled to a grant of termination of Claimant’s benefits based upon full payment of specific loss benefits absent the filing of a modification petition alleging that Claimant’s total disability has resolved into a specific loss. We affirm.

Claimant had worked for Employer as a drywall installer for approximately…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Bruckner v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Mathies Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Rife v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API