Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
Joseph S. Yinglinsky (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision which dismissed Penn Installation’s (Employer) petition for termination. The issue presented for our review is whether Employer is entitled to a grant of termination of Claimant’s benefits based upon full payment of specific loss benefits absent the filing of a modification petition alleging that Claimant’s total disability has resolved into a specific loss. We affirm.
Claimant had worked for Employer as a drywall installer for approximately…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Bruckner v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mathies Coal Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by88 opinions
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Rife v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.