Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
The issue on appeal is whether a workers’ compensation claimant who suffers a compensable injury before the effective date of the amendment to Section 306(a)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 but who is incarcerated for a criminal conviction after the effective date of that amendment, is entitled to compensation benefits during his period of incarceration. Because we find that a claimant cannot receive benefits during his period of incarceration, we affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court suspending appellant’s benefits for the time he spent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Reinforced Earth Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Cruz v. Workers Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- General Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.