Legal Opinion

Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 1997No. 42 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The issue on appeal is whether a workers’ compensation claimant who suffers a compensable injury before the effective date of the amendment to Section 306(a)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 but who is incarcerated for a criminal conviction after the effective date of that amendment, is entitled to compensation benefits during his period of incarceration. Because we find that a claimant cannot receive benefits during his period of incarceration, we affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court suspending appellant’s benefits for the time he spent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Reinforced Earth Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Cruz v. Workers Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. General Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API