Legal Opinion

Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

David J. Banic (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that reversed the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) dismissing the suspension petition filed by Trans-Bridge Lines, Inc. (Employer) and The PMA Group and ordering Employer to continue paying Claimant total disability benefits. The Board held that the referee erred because Section 306(a)(2) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended by Section 8 of the Act of July 2, 1993, P.L. 190, No. 44 (commonly referred to as “Act 44”), 77 P.S. § 311(2),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Kroh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Schroeder v. SchraderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Brinker's International, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Weissenstein)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Land O'Lakes, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API