Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Pope
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1978No. 77-695PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.
The sole question presented for our determination is whether a Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review a lower court’s order, entered pursuant to R. C. 163.09(B), in favor of an appropriating agency on one or more of the preliminary issues relative to appropriation, i. e., the condemnor’s right to make an appropriation, the inability of the owners and the condemnor to agree upon monetary compensation, and the necessity for a particular appropriation.
R. C. 163.09(B) provides as follows:
“When an answer is filed pursuant to section 3.63.08 of the Eevised Code, and any of the matters relating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. KnollmanOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Middletown v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Harkai v. Scherba Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Akron v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. GibbsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.