City of Akron v. Carter
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, Presiding Judge.
INTRODUCTION
{¶ 1} Following a court-ordered mediation conference in an appropriation proceeding, the mediator filed a report indicating that the parties had reached a settlement. The city of Akron later moved the trial court for a determination that the terms of a settlement agreement reached during mediation are not privileged under Ohio’s Uniform Mediation Act, R.C. Chapter 2710. The landowner, Roger Carter, responded with a motion in limine to exclude all mediation communications under the privilege. The trial court determined that the terms of a settlement…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Russell v. Mercy HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- WFG Natl. Title Ins. Co. v. MeehanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Pirock v. CrainOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. JohnstonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Reo v. Univ. Hosp. Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.