City of Middletown v. City Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
A majority of the court entertains the view that where the solicitor of a municipality has instituted a suit for injunction under Section 4311, General Code, at the request of a taxpayer, and the court becomes satisfied that such solicitor is not proceeding in good faith or with due diligence, the court has the inherent power to allow interested taxpayers to become intervening parties to the action, who thereupon have the same rights to plead, participate in the proceedings and appeal as if they had been original parties.
A majority of the court is also of the opinion that the trial court in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Nicholas v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Mulberger v. BeurhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Clark v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- McCandless v. PrattSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Lindblom v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Hospitality Motor Inns, Inc. v. GillespieOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. GibbsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.