Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. 92-1582PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

On August 25, 1992, we issued, sua sponte, an alternative writ ordering respondents to show cause by September 14, 1992 why the writ of mandamus should not issue and staying the August 27 hearing. In its answer, Conro urged us to issue the writ. Judge Corrigan and the probate court moved for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) (failure to state a claim for relief) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 56. Cleveland also moved to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons that follow, we overrule these motions and grant the writ of mandamus.

*325 Motions to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. KigerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Liberty Mills, Inc. v. LockerOhio Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API