Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Knollman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1939No. 27316PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

There are two procedural questions raised by the record in this case: (1) Did the Common Pleas Court err in overruling plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ motion for new trial from the files on the ground that the motion was not seasonably made, and, (2) did the Court of Appeals err in sustaining defendants ’ motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that vacating the verdict of the jury by the Common Pleas Court on motion for new trial is not a judgment or final order from which an appeal may be taken? These questions will be discussed in the order named.

Section 11578, G-eneral Code,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hubbard v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Eastman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Klever v. Reid Bros. Express, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API