Legal Opinion

TriMet v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2013No. 0806396; A149776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioner TriMet (employer) seeks judicial review of a final order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) that set aside its denial of claimant’s combined condition claim involving her left hip and lower back. Employer argues that the board erred in concluding that its September 2008 denial of claimant’s combined condition was “procedurally invalid because it denied a combined condition in the absence of an acceptance of such a condition.” See Croman Corp. v. Serrano, 163 Or App 136, 140-41, 986 P2d 1253 (1999) (under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and ORS 656.262(6)(c), a combined condition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Croman Corp. v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Stockdale v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Sports Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Shearer's Foods v. HoffnagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Sexton v. Sky Lakes Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API