Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 01-08588; A120244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

SAIF Corporation, on behalf of its insured, Hap Taylor and Sons, denied Allen’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits for “L5-S1 spondylosis,” a back condition causing stiffness and pain. Claimant requested a hearing. An administrative law judge (ALJ) analyzed the claim as though it was based on a “combined condition,” that is, a condition involving both a prior, accepted workplace injury and a degenerative disease that preceded it. He found that the workplace injury was the major contributing cause of the disability or need for treatment and therefore ordered SAIF to set aside the denial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sound Elevator v. ZwingrafCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Longview Inspection v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arms v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Hutchings v. Americas PropaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Mills v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API