Hutchings v. Americas Propane
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Claimant challenges a Workers’ Compensation Board order that upheld employer’s “combined condition” denial and employer’s denial of claimant’s request for medical services.1 On judicial review, claimant contends that employer’s combined condition denial was improper because employer failed to prove that claimant had a preexisting condition at the time of his work injury and, thus, the preexisting condition identified by employer could not have been the major contributing cause of claimant’s disability and need for treatment. As for employer’s medical services denial, claimant argues that his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-MaciasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Tattoo v. Barrett Business ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Boeing Company v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Brown v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Slater v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017