Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Young

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 2008No. 0408718; A132439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) that set aside employer’s denial of the ongoing compensability of claimant’s combined condition knee claim. The board found that employer had not carried its burden of proving that claimant’s work injury was no longer the major contributing cause of the need for treatment of the combined condition affecting claimant’s knee. Employer asserts that the board’s order lacked substantial reason in reaching that conclusion and that the board erred in requiring proof of a change of circumstances in the combined condition of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. SAIF Corp. v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Boeing Company v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Akins v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Evans v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API