Legal Opinion

Steinke v. City of Andover

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1994No. C3-93-865PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a decision by the court of appeals reversing summary judgment entered in favor of defendant City of Andover, and affirming a denial of summary judgment for defendant Anoka County. Both defendants asserted municipality immunity against personal injury claims brought by plaintiff Roger Steinke (“Steinke”), and loss of consortium claims brought by plaintiff Wenell Steinke, Steinke’s wife. Because we hold that both Andover and Anoka are entitled to municipality immunity, we reverse, reinstate the judgment in favor of the City of Andover and remand…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Conlin v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Zank v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API