Legal Opinion

Conlin v. City of Saint Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 2000No. C0-98-1541PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

The City of St. Paul (City) appeals from a decision by the court of appeals holding that the City is not entitled to statutory immunity for its failure to use signs to warn motorists about the condition of recently sealed streets. The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment based on its claim that a protected policy decision was made not to use warning signs on these types of road projects. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the City did not provide sufficient evidence that it had made a policy decision, and that instead the decision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. J.E.B. v. DanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Fear v. Independent School District 911Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Myriam Parada v. Anoka CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API