Legal Opinion
ISCO International, Inc. v. Conductos, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 21, 2003No. 01-487 GMSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, ISCO International, Inc. (“ISCO”), filed the above-captioned suit against Conductas, Inc. (“Conductas”) and Superconductor Technologies, Inc. (“STI”) on July 17, 2001, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,263,215 (“the ’215 patent”). A thirteen-day jury trial was held between March 17 and April 2, 2003. On April 3, 2003, the jury returned a verdict finding that: (1) claims 10, 15, 16, and 17 of the ’215 patent are invalid as obvious; (2) the ’215 patent is unenforceable due to inequitable conduct; (3) the accused…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. Sharp Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Total Rebuild Inc v. P H C Fluid Power L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019