Legal Opinion
Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 2, 2012No. C-11-2709 EMCPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiff Barnes & Noble’s (“BN”) affirmative defenses. Docket No. 71. After considering the parties’ submissions and oral argument, the Court hereby enters the following order.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs BN and BN.com are manufacturers and sellers of the Nook e-reader. On June 6, 2011, Plaintiffs filed this declaratory judgment action for non-infringement of patents related to Nook’s 3G, WiFi, and audio technology.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ramirez v. Ghilotti Bros.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Rasmussen v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Dodson v. Strategic Restaurants Acquisition Co. II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.