Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PLEXXIKON INC., Case No. 17-cv-04405-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 177 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion for 14 partial summary judgment that certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,469,640 (the “’640 Patent”) 15 and 9,844,539 (the “’539 Patent”) (together, the “Asserted Patents”) are invalid as anticipated 16 under
35 U.S.C. § 102.1
The dispute, as briefed…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.